Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Peace Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holsti, O. R.
Right arrow Articles by North, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Measuring Affect and Action in Inter National Reaction Models

Empirical Materials From the 1962 Cuban Crisis

Ole R. Holsti

Studies in International Conflict and Integration Stanford University, Palo Alto, California

Richard A. Brody

Studies in International Conflict and Integration Stanford University, Palo Alto, California

Robert C. North

Studies in International Conflict and Integration Stanford University, Palo Alto, California

The Cuban crisis of October 1962 may be analyzed from several perspectives. The investigator may focus his attention on the unique characteristics of the situation and sequence of events which are outlined here. The analyst of international relations may, as is suggested in this paper, examine these events so as to permit relevant comparisons with other crisis situations, both those resolved by war and those eventually resolved by non-violent means. The conceptual framework for this analysis is a two-step mediated stimulus-response model in which the acts of one nation are considered as inputs to other nations. Such psycho-political variables as perceptions and expressions of hostility are traced over time by means of content analysis of documents to test the consistency of the model. In the Cuban crisis, both sides tended to perceive rather accurately the nature of the adversary's actions and then proceeded to act at an appropriate level. Efforts by either party to delay or reverse the escalation toward conflict were generally perceived as such, and responded to in like manner.

Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 1, No. 3-4, 170-189 (1964)
DOI: 10.1177/002234336400100303


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Conflict Management and Peace ScienceHome page
S. J. Brams and W. Mattli
Theory of Moves: Overview and Examples
Conflict Management and Peace Science, January 1, 1993; 12(2): 1 - 39.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Conflict Management and Peace ScienceHome page
S. J. Brams and D. Wittman
Nonmyopic Equilibria in 2x2 Games
Conflict Management and Peace Science, January 1, 1981; 6(1): 39 - 62.
[PDF]