This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Wallensteen, P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Universalism vs. Particularism: On the Limits of Major Power Order

Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University, Department of Political Science, University of Michigan

Relations between major powers can be described as shifting between universalism and particularism. In periods of universalism, major powers try to work out acceptable rules of behavior among one another, whereas in periods of particularism, they emphasize special interests of special powers. The way historians see shifts in major power relations since 1816 largely follows such a classification. By comparing the policies pursued during four periods of universalism and four periods of particularism, as well as analysing what ended or initiated such periods, the limits of major power universalism can be evaluated. Particularly, the short-comings of the recent period of detente are illuminated. Also some principles for a more enduring form of universalism are suggested.

Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 21, No. 3, 243-257 (1984)
DOI: 10.1177/002234338402100304


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Chan Discerning the Causal Relationships Between Great Powers' Membership in Intergovernmental Organizations and Their Initiation of Militarized Disputes Conflict Management and Peace Science, July 1, 2005; 22(3): 239 - 256. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. A. Vasquez Mapping the Probability of War and Analyzing the Possibility of Peace: the Role of Territorial Disputes Conflict Management and Peace Science, January 1, 2001; 18(2): 145 - 173. [Abstract] [PDF]