This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Rittberger, V. Articles by Mendler, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Toward an East—West Security Regime: The Case of Confidence- and Security-Building Measures

Manfred Efinger

Martin Mendler

Institute of Political Science, University of Tübingen

This article seeks to explore the applicability of regime analysis to the collective management of East-West security relations. Using a narrow regime definition and starting from a `microscopic approach' to East-West relations which disaggregates the assumed conflict totality into various more or less regime-conducive issues, Confidence- and Security-Building Measures (CSBMs) in and for Europe are characterized as an evolving security regime. Regulating `conflicts about means' the CSBM regime serves to stabilize the security situation in Europe in at least three ways: (1) it decreases the likelihood of a conventional surprise attack, (2) it raises the obstacles to intra-bloc intervention, and (3) it improves crisis stability. The case of the CSBM regime is then used to test several hypotheses toward explaining the formation of a security regime. It is found that issue-area related and subsystemic determinants are superior to systemic variables in accounting for the emergence of the CSBM regime. The article closes with a discussion of the impact of the CSBM regime on the security problematique in Europe. It is shown that the CSBM regime based on a set of norms and rules has already left its mark on the perceptions of military threat by contributing to the convergence of actor expectations and by generating regular interactions. Furthermore, recent proposals of NATO and WTO clearly indicate that the persistence and further evolution of the CSBM regime seems possible and may even facilitate the conventional arms control negotiations which now are rightly ranging at the top of NATO's and WTO's efforts to create a truly confidence-building security structure in Europe. Encouraged by the case of CSBMs, the authors recommend further empirical research on security issues in East-West relations which is founded upon the theoretical perspective of international regime analysis.

Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 27, No. 1, 55-74 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/0022343390027001006


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. A. LEVY, O. R. YOUNG, and M. ZURN The Study of International Regimes European Journal of International Relations, September 1, 1995; 1(3): 267 - 330. [Abstract]

				M. BRZOSKA Is the Nuclear Non-Proliferation System a Regime? A Comment on Trevor McMorris Tate Journal of Peace Research, May 1, 1992; 29(2): 215 - 220. [Abstract]

				P. Sivonen European Security: New, Old and Borrowed Journal of Peace Research, November 1, 1990; 27(4): 385 - 397. [Abstract]