This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Galtung, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Cultural Violence

College of Social Sciences, University of Hawaii, Manoa

This article introduces a concept of `cultural violence', and can be seen as a follow-up of the author's introduction of the concept of `structural violence' over 20 years ago (Galtung, 1969). `Cultural violence' is defined here as any aspect of a culture that can be used to legitimize violence in its direct or structural form. Symbolic violence built into a culture does not kill or maim like direct violence or the violence built into the structure. However, it is used to legitimize either or both, as for instance in the theory of a Herrenvolk, or a superior race. The relations between direct, structural and cultural violence are explored, using a violence triangle and a violence strata image, with various types of casual flows. Examples of cultural violence are indicated, using a division of culture into religion and ideology, art and language, and empirical and formal science. The theory of cultural violence is then related to two basic points in Gandhism, the doctrines of unity of life and of unity of means and ends. Finally, the inclusion of culture as a major focus of peace research is seen not only as deepening the quest for peace, but also as a possible contribution to the as yet non-existent general discipline of `culturology'.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Barnett Peace and Development: Towards a New Synthesis Journal of Peace Research, January 1, 2008; 45(1): 75 - 89. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Held and H. Patomaki Problems of Global Democracy: A Dialogue Theory Culture Society, September 1, 2006; 23(5): 115 - 133. [PDF]

				C. Mason Women, Violence and Nonviolent Resistance in East Timor Journal of Peace Research, November 1, 2005; 42(6): 737 - 749. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Poddiakov Teaching Economic Thought: Landscapes After Battles Culture Psychology, December 1, 2004; 10(4): 441 - 453. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Caprioli Democracy and Human Rights Versus Women's Security: A Contradiction? Security Dialogue, December 1, 2004; 35(4): 411 - 428. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. N. Chaudhry Reconstituting Selves in the Karachi Conflict: Mohajir Women Survivors and Structural Violence Cultural Dynamics, October 1, 2004; 16(2-3): 259 - 290. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Patomaki The Challenge of Critical Theories: Peace Research at the Start of the New Century Journal of Peace Research, November 1, 2001; 38(6): 723 - 737. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Weber Gandhi, Deep Ecology, Peace Research And Buddhist Economics Journal of Peace Research, May 1, 1999; 36(3): 349 - 361. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. P. JENSEN War-Affected Societies and War-Affected Children: What are the Long-term Consequences? Childhood, August 1, 1996; 3(3): 415 - 421. [Abstract]

				R. Ottosen Enemy Images and the Journalistic Process Journal of Peace Research, February 1, 1995; 32(1): 97 - 112. [Abstract]

				T. H. ERIKSEN and I. B. NEUMANN International Relations as a Cultural System:: An Agenda for Research Cooperation and Conflict, September 1, 1993; 28(3): 233 - 264. [Abstract]

				H. Patomaki Book Review Cooperation and Conflict, September 1, 1992; 27(3): 314 - 320.

				I. B. NEUMANN Identity and Security Journal of Peace Research, May 1, 1992; 29(2): 221 - 226. [Abstract]