Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Peace Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sivonen, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

European Security: New, Old and Borrowed

Pekka Sivonen

Tampere Peace Research Institute

A conceptual distinction is made between the Cold War and the Cold War system. The former lasted from 1946-47 until about 1963, when the political freeze of East-West relations began to melt. However, the structural features of the system remained until 1989: the role of superpowers and politico-military blocs, the high peacetime level of military confrontation in Central Europe. This Cold War system was based on perceiving the risk of a major European war as both a problem (conflict escalation) and a solution (deterrence). However, over the years the dominant role of the superpowers and the alliances contributed to the management of tension reduction, and provided a framework for organizing negotiations. The system itself contributed to its own disappearance. Today, the organizational framework created during the years of the Cold War system plays a central role in managing the transformation towards increasing security dependence. Eventually, a comprehensive European security regime may emerge. Preparations for such a combined political and security order would seem to include developments on three dimensions: all-European security, military cooperation and politico-economic integration. Rather than systemic stability, the immediate objective should be predictability of change. In this situation, developing formal organizations is of secondary importance. What is urgent is to create a network of institutionalized rules for internal and international state behaviour.

Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 27, No. 4, 385-397 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/0022343390027004004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
P. DUNAY
Stability in East Central Europe
Journal of Peace Research, February 1, 1992; 29(1): 1 - 6.