This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Fontanel, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Economic Effects of Military Expenditure in Third World Countries

CEDSI, Grenoble

Three recent books by three experts on defence economics analyse the economic impact of military expenditure on economic growth and development in Less Developed Countries (LDCs). Saadet Deger's theoretical economic analysis betrays a strong bias against militarism and militarization in contemporary society. Nicole Ball presents a more general analysis, studying a large number of concrete cases, and taking their political and sociological characteristics into account. Both Deger and Ball see armament as a cause of underdevelopment. Robert Looney engages mainly in econometric analysis. He provides a comprehensive analysis of data from 77 LDCs, distinguishing between producers and non-producers of armaments. Looney's empirical results indicate that domestic political-bureaucratic influences are more important than international rivalries, and that the economic environment of arms producers differs significantly from that of non-producers. To us, however, these results seem unconvincing: data are incomplete, the econometric methods employed are very simple, and the theoretical background is weak. As regards economic analysis, Deger's study seems more rigorous, but its assumptions are heavily slanted in favour of the ideas of the peace research movement. Nicole Ball's analysis is the most interdisciplinary of the three, and also more empirical, historical and descriptive than the others. These three important books should be read by every specialist on defence problems. Their various approaches, their different perceptions of the economic impact of military expenditure and their different philosophical backgrounds provide a broader view of the economics of defence.

Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 27, No. 4, 461-466 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/0022343390027004009


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Antonakis Guns versus Butter: A Multisectoral Approach to Military Expenditure and Growth with Evidence from Greece, 1960-1993 Journal of Conflict Resolution, August 1, 1999; 43(4): 501 - 520. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Mintz and R. T. Stevenson Defense Expenditures, Economic Growth, and The "Peace Dividend": A Longitudinal Analysis of 103 Countries Journal of Conflict Resolution, June 1, 1995; 39(2): 283 - 305. [Abstract]

				N. Ball Military Expenditure in Third World Countries: A Rejoinder to Fontanel Journal of Peace Research, November 1, 1991; 28(4): 431 - 432.

				J. Fontanel Reply to Nicole Ball Journal of Peace Research, November 1, 1991; 28(4): 433 - 434.