|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Democracy, War, and Covert Action
DAVID P. FORSYTHE
Department of Political Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln
It is well established that stable industrialized democracies do not use overt force against each other. But do democracies ever use covert force against other elected governments? This article confirms the US threat or use of forcible covert action against a series of elected non-European governments during the Cold War: Iran (1953), Guatemala (1954), Indonesia (1955), Brazil (1960s), Chile (1973), Nicaragua (1980s). There are other examples of US covert non-forcible action against elected governments. Three types of analysis are offered for this pattern. On the most obvious level, the US acted on the basis of an expansive conception of its perceived security interests, fearing future developments that would work to the advantage of the USSR, even though the US was not faced with clear and present dangers to its territorial integrity and political independence. A deeper unique explanation is that, as Michael Hunt has argued, the US was encouraged in these covert actions by an informal ideology entailing beliefs in US greatness, fears of social revolution, and racism. A deeper theoretical explanation is that the targeted regimes did not qualify as mature liberal regimes showing the characteristics of neo-Kantian liberalism: representative and specialized democracy, democratic alliance, and extensive private commerce. Moreover, the neo-Kantian reliance on representative decision-making to avoid major war did not affect secret decisions involving probabilty of few US deaths.
Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 29, No. 4,
385-395 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/0022343392029004003
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
D. G. Cox and A. C. Drury
Democratic Sanctions: Connecting the Democratic Peace and Economic Sanctions
Journal of Peace Research,
November 1, 2006;
43(6):
709 - 722.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Aviles
The Democratic-Peace Thesis and U.S. Relations with Colombia and Venezuela
Latin American Perspectives,
May 1, 2005;
32(3):
33 - 59.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. I. Clement
Confronting Hugo Chavez: United States "Democracy Promotion" in Latin America
Latin American Perspectives,
May 1, 2005;
32(3):
60 - 78.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Caprioli
Democracy and Human Rights Versus Women's Security: A Contradiction?
Security Dialogue,
December 1, 2004;
35(4):
411 - 428.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Ravlo, N. P. Gleditsch, and H. Dorussen
Colonial War and the Democratic Peace
Journal of Conflict Resolution,
August 1, 2003;
47(4):
520 - 548.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. ANDERSSON
United Nations Intervention by United Democracies?: State Commitment to UN Interventions 1991-99
Cooperation and Conflict,
December 1, 2002;
37(4):
363 - 386.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A. TURES
Democracies as Intervening States: A Critique of Kegley & Hermann
Journal of Peace Research,
March 1, 2001;
38(2):
227 - 235.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Caprioli
Gendered Conflict
Journal of Peace Research,
January 1, 2000;
37(1):
51 - 68.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Peceny
Forcing Them To Be Free
Political Research Quarterly,
September 1, 1999;
52(3):
549 - 582.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. A. Leeds and D. R. Davis
Beneath the Surface: Regime Type and International Interaction, 1953-78
Journal of Peace Research,
January 1, 1999;
36(1):
5 - 21.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. W. KEGLEY JR. and M. G. HERMANN
A Peace Dividend? Democracies' Military Interventions and Their External Political Consequences
Cooperation and Conflict,
December 1, 1997;
32(4):
339 - 368.
[Abstract]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. A. Van Belle
Press Freedom and the Democratic Peace
Journal of Peace Research,
November 1, 1997;
34(4):
405 - 414.
[Abstract]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Peceny
A Constructivist Interpretation of the Liberal Peace: The Ambiguous Case of the Spanish-American War
Journal of Peace Research,
November 1, 1997;
34(4):
415 - 430.
[Abstract]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Starr
Democracy and Integration: Why Democracies Don't Fight Each Other
Journal of Peace Research,
May 1, 1997;
34(2):
153 - 162.
[Abstract]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. W. KEGLEY JR. and M. G. HERMANN
Putting Military Intervention into the Democratic Peace: A Research Note
Comparative Political Studies,
February 1, 1997;
30(1):
78 - 107.
[Abstract]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. MEERNIK
United States Military Intervention and the Promotion of Democracy
Journal of Peace Research,
November 1, 1996;
33(4):
391 - 402.
[Abstract]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. W. KEGLEY JR and M. G. HERMANN
How Democracies Use Intervention: A Neglected Dimension in Studies of the Democratic Peace
Journal of Peace Research,
August 1, 1996;
33(3):
309 - 322.
[Abstract]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Adams
Internal Military Intervention in the United States
Journal of Peace Research,
May 1, 1995;
32(2):
197 - 211.
[Abstract]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. W. KEGLEY JR and M. G. HERMANN
The Political Psychology of `Peace through Democratization'
Cooperation and Conflict,
March 1, 1995;
30(1):
5 - 30.
[Abstract]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. D. Alleyne
Thinking about the International System in the `Information Age': Theoretical Assumptions and Contradictions
Journal of Peace Research,
November 1, 1994;
31(4):
407 - 424.
[Abstract]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. ROY
Neorealism and Kant: No Pacific Union
Journal of Peace Research,
November 1, 1993;
30(4):
451 - 453.
[Abstract]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. P. GLEDITSCH
Democracy and Peace
Journal of Peace Research,
November 1, 1992;
29(4):
369 - 376.
|
|
|
|
|
