This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Park, K. Y. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

`Pouring New Wine into Fresh Wineskins': Defense Spending and Economic Growth in LDCs with Application to South Korea

Department of Political Science, Ajou University and Sogang University

A model of defense spending and economic growth, alternative to the existing ones that have been derived from neoclassical economic theories, is proposed. The new model, which attends to the distinctive conditions and structures of LDCs' political economy, is constructed by integrating key politico-economic variables tapping domestic, international, and system-level dimensions of the relationship. The model is then applied to South Korea. The findings made in this study indicate a non-significant relationship between defense spending and economic growth. It is suggested, however, that the non-significant relationship may be an indication that industrial slack has been modest in South Korea. The growth effect of defense spending may be positive when there is significant slack in the economy, or conversely, it may be negative when there is no slack in the economy. It is further suggested that the effect may manifest itself differently in different conditions of the economy even within the same economy. It may even turn non-significant when the economy is in transition from sluggish to dynamic. Thus, if the level of industrial slack determines the nature of the relationship between defense spending and economic growth, this research bridges a gap between contrasting bodies of theoretical literature on the subject. The extremes of the views may be reconcilable under a new framework that stresses the contingent nature of the relationship. Theoretical and policy implications are also discussed.

Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 30, No. 1, 79-93 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/0022343393030001007


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				U. Heo and S. D. Hahm Politics, Economics, and Defense Spending in South Korea Armed Forces & Society, July 1, 2006; 32(4): 604 - 622. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. Antonakis Military Expenditure and Economic Growth in Greece, 1960-90 Journal of Peace Research, February 1, 1997; 34(1): 89 - 100. [Abstract]

				U. HEO The Political Economy of Defense Spending in South Korea Journal of Peace Research, November 1, 1996; 33(4): 483 - 490. [Abstract]