|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
How Democracies Use Intervention: A Neglected Dimension in Studies of the Democratic Peace
CHARLES W. KEGLEY, JR
Department of Government and International Studies, University of South Carolina
MARGARET G. HERMANN
Department of Political Science and the Mershon Center, Ohio State University
Confidence has grown in the finding that democracies do not wage war against one another. Two decades of empirical investigation that support this proposition, in conjunction with the recent expansion of the democratic community, have understandably inspired hope in the `democratic peace' envisioned by Immanuel Kant and Woodrow Wilson. This article collates three streams of previously unexamined evidence that speak to the promise of this hope. Looking cross-nationally at the incidence of overt military intervention and employing two definitions of democracy, the research explores how democratic states have used this instrument of coercive diplomacy in the 1974-91 period. The study concludes with a discussion about the role that intervention might play in the preservation of peace in the post-Cold War era.
Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 33, No. 3,
309-322 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/0022343396033003005

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Nuruzzaman
Liberal Institutionalism and International Cooperation after 11 September 2001
International Studies,
July 1, 2008;
45(3):
193 - 213.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. E. Montgomery
Working for Peace While Preparing for War: The Creation of the United States Institute of Peace
Journal of Peace Research,
July 1, 2003;
40(4):
479 - 496.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Butler
U.S. Military Intervention in Crisis, 1945-1994: An Empirical Inquiry Of Just War Theory
Journal of Conflict Resolution,
April 1, 2003;
47(2):
226 - 248.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. ANDERSSON
United Nations Intervention by United Democracies?: State Commitment to UN Interventions 1991-99
Cooperation and Conflict,
December 1, 2002;
37(4):
363 - 386.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. PICKERING
War-weariness and Cumulative Effects: Victors, Vanquished, and Subsequent Interstate Intervention
Journal of Peace Research,
May 1, 2002;
39(3):
313 - 337.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. TURES
Democracies as Intervening States: A Critique of Kegley & Hermann
Journal of Peace Research,
March 1, 2001;
38(2):
227 - 235.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. G. HERMANN and C. W. KEGLEY JR.
Democracies and Intervention: Is there a Danger Zone in the Democratic Peace?
Journal of Peace Research,
March 1, 2001;
38(2):
237 - 245.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. TURES
Addressing Concerns about Applying the Democratic Peace Arguments to Interventions
Journal of Peace Research,
March 1, 2001;
38(2):
247 - 249.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. C. Prins and C. Sprecher
Institutional Constraints, Political Opposition, And Interstate Dispute Escalation: Evidence from Parliamentary Systems, 1946-89
Journal of Peace Research,
May 1, 1999;
36(3):
271 - 287.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. W. KEGLEY JR. and M. G. HERMANN
A Peace Dividend? Democracies' Military Interventions and Their External Political Consequences
Cooperation and Conflict,
December 1, 1997;
32(4):
339 - 368.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. P. Gleditsch and H. Hegre
Peace and Democracy: Three Levels of Analysis
Journal of Conflict Resolution,
April 1, 1997;
41(2):
283 - 310.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. W. KEGLEY JR. and M. G. HERMANN
Putting Military Intervention into the Democratic Peace: A Research Note
Comparative Political Studies,
February 1, 1997;
30(1):
78 - 107.
[Abstract]
|
 |
|
|
|