Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Peace Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Starr, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Democracy and Integration: Why Democracies Don't Fight Each Other

Harvey Starr

Department of Government and International Studies, University of South Carolina

While a large and growing literature has emerged which investigates the impact of the expansion of democracy on foreign policy and international politics, much of it has been characterized by insufficient attention to theoretical and conceptual clarity. To address such problems, this article is an exercise in concept clarification. It stresses that the democratic peace is a subset of the processes and results of integration, that it fits within an integration framework, and that it works according to processes already identified by integration theory which permits the synthesis of a number of `contending' explanations for the democratic peace. As part of this argument, the article also stresses the transparent nature of democracy, emphasizing the importance of the mutual perceptions of two democracies, that the other is clearly a democracy. Finally, this article reminds scholars that the focus of the democratic peace proposition is on war. While it is important to explore our theories in terms of their extension to other conflictual phenomena, we must be careful in specifying exactly what these relationships should look like.

Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 34, No. 2, 153-162 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0022343397034002003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cooperation and ConflictHome page
R. G. Blanton
Bringing the 'Community' Back: Integration, Conflict, and Cooperation
Cooperation and Conflict, March 1, 2006; 41(1): 31 - 52.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Conflict Management and Peace ScienceHome page
H. Ben-Yehuda
Opportunity Crises: Framework and Findings, 1918-1994
Conflict Management and Peace Science, January 1, 1999; 17(1): 69 - 102.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
M. Mousseau
Democracy and Compromise in Militarized Interstate Conflicts, 1816-1992
Journal of Conflict Resolution, April 1, 1998; 42(2): 210 - 230.
[Abstract]