This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Mor, B. D. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Peace Initiatives and Public Opinion: The Domestic Context of Conflict Resolution

Department of Political Science, University of Haifa

Peace initiatives to resolve enduring rivalries are launched in a two-level setting, where foreign policy imperatives interact with domestic imperatives. Public opinion, the support and mobilization of which is required for sustaining an extended conflict, plays a critical role in its resolution, especially when government preferences diverge from majority opinion. This article uses the war-proneness literature to define the domestic context in which public opinion becomes a constraint on accommodation or a trigger for it. In each context, the government must weigh the benefits of pursuing its preferred course of action against the prospects of losing office as a result of public dissatisfaction. This dilemma involves three parameters: the conflict-related beliefs of the leadership, its sensitivity to public opinion, and the structure of public opinion. The values that these parameters assume, and their configuration, comprise the domestic conditions that govern leadership decisions on peace initiatives. A case study of Israeli decision-making on the 1993 Oslo Accord serves to demonstrate the applicability and plausibility of the theoretical analysis.

Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 34, No. 2, 197-215 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/0022343397034002006


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Fielding and M. Penny What Causes Changes in Opinion About the Israeli--Palestinian Peace Process? Journal of Peace Research, January 1, 2009; 46(1): 99 - 118. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Bell and C. O'Rourke The People's Peace? Peace Agreements, Civil Society, and Participatory Democracy International Political Science Review/ Revue internationale de science pol, June 1, 2007; 28(3): 293 - 324. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Shamir and K. Shikaki Public Opinion in the Israeli-Palestinian Two-Level Game Journal of Peace Research, May 1, 2005; 42(3): 311 - 328. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Kang and J. Meernik Determinants of Post-Conflict Economic Assistance Journal of Peace Research, March 1, 2004; 41(2): 149 - 166. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Levin Structure of News Coverage of a Peace Process: A Test of the Indexing and Zero-Sum Hypotheses International Journal of Press/Politics, September 1, 2003; 8(4): 27 - 53. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. ORJUELA Building Peace in Sri Lanka: a Role for Civil Society? Journal of Peace Research, March 1, 2003; 40(2): 195 - 212. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. SHAMIR and K. SHIKAKI Determinants of Reconciliation and Compromise Among Israelis and Palestinians Journal of Peace Research, March 1, 2002; 39(2): 185 - 202. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Lust-Okar and A.F.K. Organski Coalitions and Conflict: the Case of the Palestinian-Israeli Negotiations Over the West Bank Conflict Management and Peace Science, January 1, 2002; 19(2): 23 - 58. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. M. Greig Moments of Opportunity: Recognizing Conditions of Ripeness for International Mediation between Enduring Rivals Journal of Conflict Resolution, December 1, 2001; 45(6): 691 - 718. [Abstract] [PDF]