This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Keith, L. C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Does It Make a Difference in Human Rights Behavior?

Department of Political Science, University of North Texas

Formal acceptance of international agreements on human rights has progressed to the point where currently over three-quarters of the UN member states are parties to the International Covenant on Political and Civil Rights. In fact, becoming a party to this covenant seems to be concomitant with joining the UN. Of the newly independent states in Eastern Europe and in the region of the former Soviet Union, only Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Moldova, and Macedonia have not joined the treaty. This article tests empirically whether becoming a party to this international treaty (and its optional protocol) has an observable impact on the state party's actual behavior. The hypothesis is tested across 178 countries over an eighteen-year period (1976-93) and across four different measures of state human rights behavior. Initial bivariate analyses demonstrate some statistically significant differences between the behavior of states parties and the behavior of non-party states. However, this difference does not appear in the bivariate analysis that compares the states parties' behavior before becoming a party to the treaty with their behavior after becoming a party state. When the analysis progresses to more sophisticated multivariate analysis, in which factors known to affect human rights are controlled, the impact of the covenant and its optional protocol disappears altogether. Overall, this study suggests that it may be overly optimistic to expect that being a party to this international covenant will produce an observable direct impact.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. K. Butler, T. Gluch, and N. J. Mitchell Security Forces and Sexual Violence: A Cross-National Analysis of a Principal Agent Argument Journal of Peace Research, November 1, 2007; 44(6): 669 - 687. [Abstract] [PDF]

				O. A. Hathaway Why Do Countries Commit to Human Rights Treaties? Journal of Conflict Resolution, August 1, 2007; 51(4): 588 - 621. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. M. Hafner-Burton and K. Tsutsui Justice Lost! The Failure of International Human Rights Law To Matter Where Needed Most Journal of Peace Research, July 1, 2007; 44(4): 407 - 425. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Davenport State Repression and the Tyrannical Peace Journal of Peace Research, July 1, 2007; 44(4): 485 - 504. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Caprioli and P. F. Trumbore Human Rights Rogues in Interstate Disputes, 1980-2001 Journal of Peace Research, March 1, 2006; 43(2): 131 - 148. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. K. Bohara, N. J. Mitchell, and M. Nepal Opportunity, Democracy, and the Exchange of Political Violence: A Subnational Analysis of Conflict in Nepal Journal of Conflict Resolution, February 1, 2006; 50(1): 108 - 128. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Neumayer Do International Human Rights Treaties Improve Respect for Human Rights? Journal of Conflict Resolution, December 1, 2005; 49(6): 925 - 953. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. M. Hafner-Burton Right or Robust? The Sensitive Nature of Repression to Globalization Journal of Peace Research, November 1, 2005; 42(6): 679 - 698. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Melander Political Gender Equality and State Human Rights Abuse Journal of Peace Research, March 1, 2005; 42(2): 149 - 166. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Caprioli Democracy and Human Rights Versus Women's Security: A Contradiction? Security Dialogue, December 1, 2004; 35(4): 411 - 428. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. C. Keith Constitutional Provisions for Individual Human Rights (1977-1996): Are They More than Mere "Window Dressing?" Political Research Quarterly, March 1, 2002; 55(1): 111 - 143. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. D. WOLF The New Raison d'Etat as a Problem for Democracy in World Society European Journal of International Relations, September 1, 1999; 5(3): 333 - 363. [Abstract] [PDF]