Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Peace Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barbieri, K.
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Globalization and Peace: Assessing New Directions in the Study of Trade and Conflict

Katherine Barbieri

Department of Political Science, Vanderbilt University

Gerald Schneider

Faculty of Public Administration, University of Konstantz

`Globalization' has largely superseded the term `economic interdependence' to describe the rapidly growing links between nations, economies, and societies. The effects that the internationalization of the world system has on social equality, the environment, and economic growth are, however, still largely disputed. In this article, we discuss the literature that covers another intensively debated issue and which attempts to assess the relationship between trade and interstate conflict. Although liberal economists maintain that economic interdependence exerts an unconditionally pacifying influence on interstate relations, we show that the most recent formal work expects that trade will have a negligible and, in the perspective of one important model at least, even an amplifying effect on conflict. Much empirical work, by contrast, supports the claim that the relationship between trade and conflict is direct and not mitigated by contextual factors. We review the different controversies on the link between economic interdependence and militarized disputes and outline some major challenges that have not yet been adequately dealt with in the scientific study of war and peace.

Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 36, No. 4, 387-404 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0022343399036004001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Conflict Management and Peace ScienceHome page
D. Carment, Y. Samy, and S. Prest
State Fragility and Implications for Aid Allocation: An Empirical Analysis
Conflict Management and Peace Science, September 1, 2008; 25(4): 349 - 373.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Political Science Review/ Revue internationale de science polHome page
Chunlong Lu and Ye Tian
Popular Support for Economic Internationalism in Mainland China: A Six-Cities Public Opinion Survey
International Political Science Review/ Revue internationale de science pol, September 1, 2008; 29(4): 391 - 409.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
M. D. Ward and P. D. Hoff
Persistent Patterns of International Commerce
Journal of Peace Research, March 1, 2007; 44(2): 157 - 175.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Conflict Management and Peace ScienceHome page
D. V. Frazier
Third Party Characteristics, Territory and the Mediation of Militarized Interstate Disputes
Conflict Management and Peace Science, September 1, 2006; 23(4): 267 - 284.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
G. Press-Barnathan
The Neglected Dimension of Commercial Liberalism: Economic Cooperation and Transition to Peace
Journal of Peace Research, May 1, 2006; 43(3): 261 - 278.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cooperation and ConflictHome page
R. G. Blanton
Bringing the 'Community' Back: Integration, Conflict, and Cooperation
Cooperation and Conflict, March 1, 2006; 41(1): 31 - 52.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
H. M. Kim and D. L. Rousseau
The Classical Liberals Were Half Right (or Half Wrong): New Tests of the 'Liberal Peace', 1960-88
Journal of Peace Research, September 1, 2005; 42(5): 523 - 543.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cooperation and ConflictHome page
Y.-C. Chang
Economic Interdependence and International Interactions: Impact of Third-Party Trade on Political Cooperation and Conflict
Cooperation and Conflict, June 1, 2005; 40(2): 207 - 232.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Conflict Management and Peace ScienceHome page
M. A. Benson
The Relevance of Politically Relevant Dyads in the Study of Interdependence and Dyadic Disputes
Conflict Management and Peace Science, April 1, 2005; 22(2): 113 - 133.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
P. J. McDonald
Peace through Trade or Free Trade?
Journal of Conflict Resolution, August 1, 2004; 48(4): 547 - 572.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
K. Barbieri and R. A. Peters II
Measure for Mis-measure: A Response to Gartzke & Li
Journal of Peace Research, November 1, 2003; 40(6): 713 - 719.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
E. Gartzke and Q. Li
Measure for Measure: Concept Operationalization and the Trade Interdependence-Conflict Debate
Journal of Peace Research, September 1, 2003; 40(5): 553 - 571.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
W. Reed
Information and Economic Interdependence
Journal of Conflict Resolution, February 1, 2003; 47(1): 54 - 71.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
M. A. ALEXSEEV
Economic Valuations and Interethnic Fears: Perceptions of Chinese Migration in the Russian Far East
Journal of Peace Research, January 1, 2003; 40(1): 85 - 102.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
K. S. GLEDITSCH
Expanded Trade and GDP Data
Journal of Conflict Resolution, October 1, 2002; 46(5): 712 - 724.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
B. M. E. JUNGBLUT and R. J. STOLL
The Liberal Peace and Conflictive Interactions: The Onset of Militarized Interstate Disputes, 1950-78
Journal of Peace Research, September 1, 2002; 39(5): 527 - 546.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
D. H. BEARCE and E. ON. FISHER
Economic Geography, Trade, and War
Journal of Conflict Resolution, June 1, 2002; 46(3): 365 - 393.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Conflict Management and Peace ScienceHome page
S. W. Polachek
Trade-Based Interactions: an Interdisciplinary Perspective
Conflict Management and Peace Science, January 1, 2002; 19(2): 1 - 21.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
E. D. Mansfield and B. M. Pollins
The Study of Interdependence and Conflict: Recent Advances, Open Questions, and Directions for Future Research
Journal of Conflict Resolution, December 1, 2001; 45(6): 834 - 859.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
K. Barbieri and J. S. Levy
Does War Impede Trade? A Response to Anderton & Carter
Journal of Peace Research, September 1, 2001; 38(5): 619 - 624.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
C. H. Anderton and J. R. Carter
The Impact of War on Trade: An Interrupted Times-Series Study
Journal of Peace Research, July 1, 2001; 38(4): 445 - 457.
[Abstract] [PDF]