This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Meernik, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Modeling International Crises and the Political Use of Military Force by the USA

Department of Political Science, University of North Texas

While the literature on the political use of military force by the USA has undergone tremendous growth in recent years, one crucial feature of this foreign policy activity has not been modeled - the conditions that give rise to the crises that precipitate a use of force. It is possible that many of the findings on the diversionary use of force obtain because of problems with selection effects. More uses of force may occur during certain periods simply because more crises occur during these times. Therefore, I explain how we may model crisis occurrence and the use of force to help us better understand the role of selection effects and the salience of domestic conditions in the decision to use force. I outline several hypotheses regarding the influence of domestic and crisis-specific factors to predict when opportunities to use force will occur and, given some opportunity, when a president will use military force. The results demonstrate that by not accounting for selection effects in the decision to use force by US presidents, we may have erroneously concluded that presidents use force to divert public attention.

Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 37, No. 5, 547-562 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0022343300037005001


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Cottle and M. Rai Global 24/7 news providers: Emissaries of global dominance or global public sphere? Global Media and Communication, August 1, 2008; 4(2): 157 - 181. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. A.M. Davies Strategic Cooperation, the Invasion of Iraq and the Behaviour of the `Axis of Evil', 1990--2004 Journal of Peace Research, May 1, 2008; 45(3): 385 - 399. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. A.M. Davies US Presidential popularity and opportunities to coerce North Korea: a quantitative test 1990 2000 International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, May 1, 2007; 7(2): 129 - 153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. M. Foster State Power, Linkage Mechanisms, and Diversion against Nonrivals Conflict Management and Peace Science, February 1, 2006; 23(1): 1 - 21. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Lai The Effects of Different Types of Military Mobilization on the Outcome of International Crises Journal of Conflict Resolution, April 1, 2004; 48(2): 211 - 229. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. O. FORDHAM Another Look at "Parties, Voters, and the Use of Force Abroad" Journal of Conflict Resolution, August 1, 2002; 46(4): 572 - 596. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. SPRECHER and K. DeROUEN Jr. Israeli Military Actions and Internalization-externalization Processes Journal of Conflict Resolution, April 1, 2002; 46(2): 244 - 259. [Abstract] [PDF]