This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Robinson, P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Policy-Media Interaction Model: Measuring Media Power during Humanitarian Crisis

School of Politics and Communication Studies, University of Liverpool

This article details the results of a plausibility probe of a policy-media interaction model designed to identify instances of media influence. If sufficient evidence is found to support the model, it can be used as part of a wider study examining the impact of media coverage on decisions to intervene during humanitarian crisis, the so-called CNN effect. The model predicts media influence when policy is uncertain and media coverage is framed so as to be critical of government and empathizes with suffering people. In order to test the model, it is applied to two cases: US intervention in Bosnia in 1995 in order to defend the Gorazde `safe area' and Operation Allied Force in Kosovo in 1999. In the first case, the model highlights the impact of critical, empathizing media coverage and policy uncertainty in effecting the US decision to defend the Gorazde `safe area'. In the second case, the failure of critical newspaper coverage to change the Clinton Administration's air-war policy highlights the limits of media influence when there exists policy certainty. Overall, it is argued that the plausibility probe supports the prediction that media influence occurs when policy is uncertain and media coverage is critically framed and empathizes with suffering people. And that when policy is certain, media influence is unlikely to occur. As such, the policy-media interaction model should prove a useful tool in testing the claim that media coverage causes intervention during humanitarian crisis.

Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 37, No. 5, 613-633 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0022343300037005006


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. J. Barker Democracy or polyarchy? US-funded media developments in Afghanistan and Iraq post 9/11 Media Culture Society, January 1, 2008; 30(1): 109 - 130. [PDF]

				Y. Bloch-Elkon Studying the Media, Public Opinion, and Foreign Policy in International Crises: The United States and the Bosnian Crisis, 1992 1995 International Journal of Press/Politics, October 1, 2007; 12(4): 20 - 51. [Abstract] [PDF]

				V. Bakir Policy Agenda Setting and Risk Communication: Greenpeace, Shell, and Issues of Trust International Journal of Press/Politics, July 1, 2006; 11(3): 67 - 88. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J Brownscombe Crisis in humanitarianism? J. Med. Ethics, March 1, 2005; 31(3): 182 - 183. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Auerbach and Y. Bloch-Elkon Media Framing and Foreign Policy: The Elite Press vis-a-vis US Policy in Bosnia, 1992-95 Journal of Peace Research, January 1, 2005; 42(1): 83 - 99. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. A. Boettcher III Military Intervention Decisions Regarding Humanitarian Crises: Framing Induced Risk Behavior Journal of Conflict Resolution, June 1, 2004; 48(3): 331 - 355. [Abstract] [PDF]