This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by NEUMAYER, E. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Do Democracies Exhibit Stronger International Environmental Commitment? A Cross-country Analysis

Department of Geography and Environment, London School of Economics and Political Science e.neumayer{at}lse.ac.uk

This article tests the hypothesis that democracies exhibit stronger international environmental commitment than non-democracies, using multivariate econometric techniques. A number of proxy variables are used in lieu of environmental commitment, a non-observable variable. Strong evidence is found that democracies sign and ratify more multilateral environmental agreements, participate in more environmental intergovernmental organizations, comply better with reporting requirements under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Fauna and Flora, put a greater percentage of their land area under protections status, are more likely to have a National Council on Sustainable Development in their country and have more environmentally relevant information available than non-democracies. The findings suggest that a spread of democracy around the world will lead to enhanced environmental commitment worldwide. Results are robust with respect to inclusion or exclusion of developed countries in the sample. The use of four different variables for democracy also ensures robustness with respect to the measure of democracy. The strong evidence in favour of a positive link between democracy and environmental commitment stands in contrast to the somewhat weak evidence on such a link between democracy and environmental outcomes. The explanation presumably is that theory predicts a stronger positive link of democracy with environmental commitment than with environmental outcomes.

Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 39, No. 2, 139-164 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0022343302039002001


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. B. Whitford and K. Wong Political and Social Foundations for Environmental Sustainability Political Research Quarterly, March 1, 2009; 62(1): 190 - 204. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. von Stein The International Law and Politics of Climate Change: Ratification of the United Nations Framework Convention and the Kyoto Protocol Journal of Conflict Resolution, April 1, 2008; 52(2): 243 - 268. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. D. Mansfield and J. C. Pevehouse Democratization and the Varieties of International Organizations Journal of Conflict Resolution, April 1, 2008; 52(2): 269 - 294. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Barnett Peace and Development: Towards a New Synthesis Journal of Peace Research, January 1, 2008; 45(1): 75 - 89. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Q. Li and R. Reuveny The Effects of Liberalism on the Terrestrial Environment Conflict Management and Peace Science, July 1, 2007; 24(3): 219 - 238. [Abstract] [PDF]

				X. Dai The Conditional Nature of Democratic Compliance Journal of Conflict Resolution, October 1, 2006; 50(5): 690 - 713. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Pellegrini and R. Gerlagh Corruption, Democracy, and Environmental Policy: An Empirical Contribution to the Debate The Journal of Environment Development, September 1, 2006; 15(3): 332 - 354. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Ward International Linkages and Environmental Sustainability: The Effectiveness of the Regime Network Journal of Peace Research, March 1, 2006; 43(2): 149 - 166. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Q. Grafton and S. Knowles Social Capital and National Environmental Performance: A Cross-Sectional Analysis The Journal of Environment Development, December 1, 2004; 13(4): 336 - 370. [Abstract] [PDF]