Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Peace Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SHAMIR, J.
Right arrow Articles by SHIKAKI, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Determinants of Reconciliation and Compromise Among Israelis and Palestinians

JACOB SHAMIR

Department of Communication and Journalism, Hebrew University of Jerusalem

KHALIL SHIKAKI

Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research

This joint Palestinian-Israeli study stresses the importance of public opinion in reconciliation processes. It was conducted in the wake of the Arafat-Barak Camp David summit and intended to set up a baseline for sentiments of compromise and reconciliation among Israelis and Palestinians at the peak of the Palestinian-Israeli peace process. The study is based on surveys of representative samples of the Israeli adult population (n = 525) and the Palestinian adult population in the West Bank, the Gaza Strip and East Jerusalem (n = 1,259). It focuses on the role of expectations for lasting peace and democracy in shaping attitudes towards reconciliation and political compromise. Both publics felt that there is no room for further compromise on the most critical issues of the conflict; the majority in both samples believed that their delegations have made too much of a compromise already. A reliable reconciliation scale was devised from a range of steps listed in the reconciliation literature as prerequisites for successful reconciliation following protracted conflicts. Palestinians overwhelmingly supported reconciliation steps, which promise normalization and a chance for economic well-being. They were more reluctant to support steps towards political alliance and ethos-transforming steps. Israelis' support for all reconciliation measures except for open borders was noticeably higher. Expectations were found to account for reconciliation and compromise sentiments beyond demographic and political-orientation variables for both the Israeli and Palestinian samples.

Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 39, No. 2, 185-202 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0022343302039002003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
D. Fielding and M. Penny
What Causes Changes in Opinion About the Israeli--Palestinian Peace Process?
Journal of Peace Research, January 1, 2009; 46(1): 99 - 118.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
E. Halperin
Group-based Hatred in Intractable Conflict in Israel
Journal of Conflict Resolution, October 1, 2008; 52(5): 713 - 736.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
S. J. Kaufman
Escaping the Symbolic Politics Trap: Reconciliation Initiatives and Conflict Resolution in Ethnic Wars
Journal of Peace Research, March 1, 2006; 43(2): 201 - 218.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
J. Shamir and K. Shikaki
Public Opinion in the Israeli-Palestinian Two-Level Game
Journal of Peace Research, May 1, 2005; 42(3): 311 - 328.
[Abstract] [PDF]