This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by PARISH, R. Articles by PECENY, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Kantian Liberalism and the Collective Defense of Democracy in Latin America

Department of Political Science, University of New Mexico

MARK PECENY

Department of Political Science, University of New Mexico

This article highlights a systemic aspect of the liberal peace that has been underemphasized by the existing literature. It argues that the liberal peace is constructed in part by the active efforts of a variety of liberal states and international organizations to promote democracy within states. This article examines the collective defense of democracy regime in the Americas to illustrate this political dynamic and applies Immanuel Kant's original formulation of the liberal pacific union to understand the contemporary inter-American system. The combination of a stronger Organization of American States built on a liberal democratic consensus among member-states, increasing trade interdependence, and a more liberal regional hegemony has transformed the inter-American system. One of the principal manifestations of this enhanced liberalism is that states in the Americas have agreed to intervene collectively in the domestic affairs of member-states to ensure the continuation of democratic regimes. For elected leaders and economic elites throughout the region and US policymakers, this support for democratic rule reflects material self-interest more than liberal idealism. While this collective defense of democracy regime, codified in the `Santiago Commitment' of 1991, clearly reflects the increasingly liberal character of the inter-American system, this regime also challenges the principled commitment to self-determination that was essential to Kant's original formulation of the liberal pacific union. We examine the regional response to the first three overt challenges to the Santiago Commitment, in Haiti (1991), Peru (1992), and Guatemala (1993) to show how the collective defense of democracy has become a crucial element of how liberalism shapes international politics in the Americas.

Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 39, No. 2, 229-250 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0022343302039002005


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. D. Mansfield and J. C. Pevehouse Democratization and the Varieties of International Organizations Journal of Conflict Resolution, April 1, 2008; 52(2): 269 - 294. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Tusicisny Security Communities and Their Values: Taking Masses Seriously International Political Science Review/ Revue internationale de science pol, September 1, 2007; 28(4): 425 - 449. [Abstract] [PDF]