This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Neumayer, E. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Good Policy Can Lower Violent Crime: Evidence from a Cross-National Panel of Homicide Rates, 1980–97

Department of Geography and Environment, London School of Economics and Political Scienceeneumayer{at}lse.ac.uk

This article provides empirical evidence that good political governance and good economic policies can lower homicide rates. Therefore, violent crime is not simply determined by modernization, population characteristics, and cultural factors. This result follows from rigorous econometric testing based on a cross-national panel of homicide data from up to 117 countries over the period 1980–97. Contrary to most existing studies, which have applied ordinary least squares on data drawn from one time period only, this analysis uses a fixed-effects estimator with fully robust standard errors. A fixed-effects estimator elegantly controls for time-invariant determinants, such as cultural factors, and allows the pooling of homicide data from otherwise incompatible sources. This is complemented by randomeffects estimation in sensitivity analysis. The results suggest that economic growth, higher income levels, respect for human rights, and the abolition of the death penalty are all associated with lower homicide rates. The same is true for democracy at high levels of democracy. The transition from autocracy to democracy is likely to be accompanied by a rising homicide rate, however, until full democracy has been reached. Results also indicate that policies aimed at improving equity have no effect on violent crime. In particular, there is evidence that the positive effect of income inequality on homicide rates found in many studies might be spurious. The results reported here are strikingly similar to those found for the causes of civil war.

Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 40, No. 6, 619-640 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/00223433030406001


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Uludag, M. Colvin, D. Hussey, and A. L. Eng Democracy, Inequality, Modernization, Routine Activities, and International Variations in Personal Crime Victimization International Criminal Justice Review, September 1, 2009; 19(3): 265 - 286. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Minkov Risk-Taking Reproductive Competition Explains National Murder Rates Better Than Socioeconomic Inequality Cross-Cultural Research, February 1, 2009; 43(1): 3 - 29. [Abstract] [PDF]

				O. T. Muldoon, K. Mclaughlin, N. Rougier, and K. Trew Adolescents' Explanations for Paramilitary Involvement Journal of Peace Research, September 1, 2008; 45(5): 681 - 695. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Jacobs and A. M. Richardson Economic Inequality and Homicide in the Developed Nations From 1975 to 1995 Homicide Studies, February 1, 2008; 12(1): 28 - 45. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Savolainen, M. Lehti, and J. Kivivuori Historical Origins of a Cross-National Puzzle: Homicide in Finland, 1750 to 2000 Homicide Studies, February 1, 2008; 12(1): 67 - 89. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Neumayer Inequality and Violent Crime: Evidence from Data on Robbery and Violent Theft Journal of Peace Research, January 1, 2005; 42(1): 101 - 112. [Abstract] [PDF]