This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Dulic, T. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A Reply to Rummel

Tomislav Duli

Uppsala Programme for Holocaust and Genocide Studies, Uppsala Universitytomislav.dulic{at}multietn.uu.se

Duli lists some of the most important points in Rummel’s critique. He argues that the objections are misplaced since he is quoting Rummel or using his data. Moreover, Rummel could have shown why he feels that Duli is wrong by giving his own estimates to be compared with Duli’s extrapolations. Most importantly, Duli argues that Rummel has avoided the central point of his critique, namely, that of source criticism. Contrary to Rummel, Duli argues that the case study on Tito’s Yugoslavia might well have wider implications, since it focuses on Rummel’s method. The methodological problems need to be addressed before Rummel’s data and conclusions can be considered reliable. Whether such a revision would yield significantly new results remains undecided.

Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 41, No. 1, 105-106 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0022343304040501


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?