This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Reuveny, R. Articles by Thompson, W. R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

World Economic Growth, Systemic Leadership, and Southern Debt Crises

School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana Universityrreuveny{at}indiana.edu

William R. Thompson

Department of Political Science, Indiana University

Conventionally, Southern debt crises are thought to be isolated policy problems that take place from time to time. This article extends the leadership-long cycle approach to international political economy to explain the recurrence of Southern debt crises. The focus is on global debt crises that affect many Southern countries at the same time, as opposed to localized crises that affect a single country or few countries. The unit of analysis is subsystemic, where countries are classified as belonging to the South (less developed) or the North (developed). Within this context, Southern debt problems are part of a structural process associated with long waves of global economic growth and technological innovation. Radical innovation in the North discontinuously stimulates growth in the North. Northern prosperity increases the demand for Southern exports. To meet the increased demand, the South borrows from the North but is then unable to meet interest payments when Northern economic growth and Northern demand for Southern commodities decay. Three other forces of significance are the levels of systemic leadership, Northern conflict, and the inherent inertia of Southern debt problems. Testing this argument with annual data from 1870 to 1989 on the proportion of Southern countries in the international system that experience debt crises, it is found that Southern debt crises, systematically and significantly, are less likely in the presence of strong systemic political-economic leadership and world economic growth, and are more likely in the presence of Northern conflict and past Southern debt crises.

Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 41, No. 1, 5-24 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0022343304040047


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Rasler and W. R. Thompson Globalization and North--South Inequality, 1870--2000: A Factor for Convergence, Divergence or Both? International Journal of Comparative Sociology, October 1, 2009; 50(5-6): 425 - 451. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Reuveny and W. R. Thompson The Limits of Economic Globalization: Still Another North-South Cleavage? International Journal of Comparative Sociology, April 1, 2007; 48(2-3): 107 - 135. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Pickering and E. F. Kisangani Political, Economic, and Social Consequences of Foreign Military Intervention Political Research Quarterly, September 1, 2006; 59(3): 363 - 376. [Abstract] [PDF]