This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (12) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Olsson, O. Articles by Fors, H. C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Congo: The Prize of Predation

Department of Economics, Göteborg University, ola.olsson{at}economics.gu.se

Heather Congdon Fors

Department of Economics, Göteborg University

The article analyzes the war against Mobutu (1996-97) and the more recent war (1998-) in the Democratic Republic of the Congo with particular attention to greed and grievance as motivating factors in these two wars. Whereas the authors’ usage of the term ‘greed’ simply reflects the desire to gain control of natural resource rents, they model ‘grievance’ as deliberate institutional differences, implemented by the ruler, between the formal and informal sectors. On the basis of quantitative and qualitative evidence, the authors outline a model of a predatory conflict between a kleptocratic ruler and a group of potential predators within a given region. The potential predators choose between peaceful production and predation on the ruling elite, who control the country’s natural resource rents. It is shown that institutional grievance between the formal and informal sectors, along with the relative strength of the ruler’s defense, play a key role for the initiation of a war. This observation is used to explain the timing of the two wars analyzed in this article. The model also shows that once a war has commenced, the abundance of natural resources and the ruler’s kleptocratic tendencies determine conflict intensity. This result is also well in line with experience from the most recent Congolese war.

Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 41, No. 3, 321-336 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0022343304043772


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Herreros and H. Criado Pre-emptive or Arbitrary: Two Forms of Lethal Violence in a Civil War Journal of Conflict Resolution, June 1, 2009; 53(3): 419 - 445. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C.-J. Dalgaard and O. Olsson Windfall Gains, Political Economy and Economic Development J. Afr. Econ., January 1, 2008; 17(suppl_1): 72 - 109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Korf Functions of violence revisited: greed, pride and grievance in Sri Lanka's civil war Progress in Development Studies, April 1, 2006; 6(2): 109 - 122. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Korf and S. Engel On the Incentives of Violence: Greed and Pride in Sri Lanka.s Civil War South Asia Economic Journal, March 1, 2006; 7(1): 99 - 116. [PDF]

				M. Bussmann, G. Schneider, and N. Wiesehomeier Foreign Economic Liberalization and Peace: The Case of Sub-Saharan Africa European Journal of International Relations, December 1, 2005; 11(4): 551 - 579. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Hegre The Duration and Termination of Civil War Journal of Peace Research, May 1, 2004; 41(3): 243 - 252. [Abstract] [PDF]