This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Väyrynen, T. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Book Review: A Shared Understanding: Gadamer and International Conflict Resolution

Tampere Peace Research Institute, University of Tampere, tarja.vayrynen{at}uta.fi

Negotiation and conflict resolution theories do little to shed light on the role of understanding in resolving violent political conflicts. A useful complement is Hans-Georg Gadamer’s hermeneutics. The question addressed in the essay is this: How is a shared understanding reached in a negotiation process aimed at resolving conflicting issues? In Gadamer’s view, understanding is important, because conflict resolution engages the parties to a conflict in a dialogue of interpreting meaning and values. Any mediators involved will also take part in the interpretation of meaning: theirs is a job of a translator; that is, they will interpret and transfer meaning between the language games the parties in conflict play. The Gadamerian model is, however, limited because it does not tackle the issue of asymmetry and power in international conflict resolution. Despite its limitations, the theoretical model can be translated into practical policy implications, which suggest that an outside party cannot force the parties into a dialogue. Attempts at conflict settlement that rely on force are unlikely to be successful.

Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 42, No. 3, 347-355 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0022343305052017


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C.A.S.E. Collective Critical Approaches to Security in Europe: A Networked Manifesto Security Dialogue, December 1, 2006; 37(4): 443 - 487. [Abstract] [PDF]