This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Li, Q. Articles by Wen, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Immediate and Lingering Effects of Armed Conflict on Adult Mortality: A Time-Series Cross-National Analysis

Department of Political Science, Pennsylvania State University, quanli{at}psu.edu

Ming Wen

Department of Sociology, University of Utah, ming.wen{at}soc.utah.edu

This research investigates the effect of armed conflict on adult mortality across countries and over time. Theoretical mechanisms are specified for how military violence influences adult mortality, both immediately and over time after conflict. The effects of aggregate conflict, interstate and intrastate conflicts, and conflict severity are explored. The Heckman selection model is applied to account for the conflict-induced missing data problem. A pooled analysis across 84 countries for the period from 1961 to 1998 provides broad empirical support for the proposed theoretical expectations across both genders. This study confirms the importance of both the immediate and the lingering effect of military conflict on the mortality of the working-age population. The immediate effect of civil conflict is much stronger than that of the interstate conflict, while the reverse applies to the lingering effect. Both the immediate and the lingering effects of severe conflict are much stronger than those of minor conflict. While men tend to suffer higher mortality immediately from intrastate conflict and severe conflict, women in the long run experience as much mortality owing to the lingering effects of these conflicts. The mortality data show a strong data selection bias caused by military conflict. The research findings highlight the imperative for negotiating peace. Preventing a contest from escalating into a severe conflict can produce noticeable gains in saved human lives.

Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 42, No. 4, 471-492 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0022343305054092


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Carlton-Ford and D. Boop Civil War and Life Chances: A Multinational Study International Sociology, January 1, 2010; 25(1): 75 - 97. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. H. Howard, R. Shegog, J. Grussendorf, L. J. Benjamins, D. Stelzig, and A. L. McAlister www.PeaceTest.org: Development, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Web-Based War-Prevention Program in a Time of War Journal of Peace Research, September 1, 2007; 44(5): 559 - 571. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. R. Oneal and B. Russett Rule of Three, Let It Be? When More Really Is Better Conflict Management and Peace Science, September 1, 2005; 22(4): 293 - 310. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Brunborg and H. Urdal The Demography of Conflict and Violence: An Introduction Journal of Peace Research, July 1, 2005; 42(4): 371 - 374. [Abstract] [PDF]