This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (9) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hafner-Burton, E. M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Right or Robust? The Sensitive Nature of Repression to Globalization

Nuffield College, University of Oxford

A growing number of studies provide quantitative evidence that economic globalization encourages government protection of human rights: trade and investment advance civil and political rights and encourage governments to refrain from violations of the right to life, liberty, and the security of the person. Other studies provide evidence that globalization promotes government repression of human rights: the arbitrary arrest, torture, forced disappearance, or extra-judicial killing of citizens, activists, or dissidents by state security forces under the control of ruling state elites. This article employs a variant of Extreme Bounds Analysis in order to analyze the robustness of this growing body of important but contradictory inferences. It argues that (1) we can make robust empirical claims about the relationship between certain trade and investment indicators and government repression, but shows that (2) cumulative knowledge across studies nevertheless remains limited by the sensitivity of many indicators to conditioning sets of information. This problem stems from vaguely specified theoretical mechanisms linking economic processes to government repression and is of potentially great consequence for scholarship seeking to explain the causes of human rights violations, in particular, and the effects of economic globalization, in general.

Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 42, No. 6, 679-698 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0022343305057887


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Peksen Better or Worse? The Effect of Economic Sanctions on Human Rights Journal of Peace Research, January 1, 2009; 46(1): 59 - 77. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Mosley Workers' Rights in Open Economies: Global Production and Domestic Institutions in the Developing World Comparative Political Studies, April 1, 2008; 41(4-5): 674 - 714. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Barnett Peace and Development: Towards a New Synthesis Journal of Peace Research, January 1, 2008; 45(1): 75 - 89. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. M. Hafner-Burton, K. Tsutsui, and J. W. Meyer International Human Rights Law and the Politics of Legitimation: Repressive States and Human Rights Treaties International Sociology, January 1, 2008; 23(1): 115 - 141. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Mosley and S. Uno Racing to the Bottom or Climbing to the Top? Economic Globalization and Collective Labor Rights Comparative Political Studies, August 1, 2007; 40(8): 923 - 948. [Abstract] [PDF]