Journal of Peace Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Datasets
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ward, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 43, No. 2, 149-166 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0022343306061545
© 2006 International Peace Research Institute, Oslo

International Linkages and Environmental Sustainability: The Effectiveness of the Regime Network

Hugh Ward

Department of Government, University of Essex

While the literature on environmental regime effectiveness has focused on particular regimes considered in isolation, the overall effects of the system of regimes are more relevant. First, regimes are connected because they often share institutional architecture, deal with different aspects of the same problem, frame issues using similar legal and policy principles, and are subject to attempts to coordinate across issues by groups of nations, NGOs and international agencies. Thus, the network of regimes has social capital that can be applied to particular issues. Second, owing to ecological interconnectedness, regimes can have both positive and negative side-effects on environmental issues that they do not explicitly deal with. Allowing for political interconnectedness using concepts drawn from social network theory and for ecological interconnectedness using broad measures of sustainability, this article argues that nations more central to the network of environmental regimes should score higher on measures of sustainability. This is because the social capital in the regime network can more easily be brought to bear on centrally placed nations to make them cooperate and because they are more likely to be aware of negative regime side-effects. Measures of network centrality do, indeed, positively impact on nations’ performance on four sustainability indicators. The analysis also finds that a nation's position in the general international system further positively impacts on its sustainability scores. This leads to the suggestion that the environmental regime network is supported by social capital in more general international networks.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
E. M. Hafner-Burton, J. von Stein, and E. Gartzke
International Organizations Count
Journal of Conflict Resolution, April 1, 2008; 52(2): 175 - 188.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
H. Dorussen and H. Ward
Intergovernmental Organizations and the Kantian Peace: A Network Perspective
Journal of Conflict Resolution, April 1, 2008; 52(2): 189 - 212.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
J. von Stein
The International Law and Politics of Climate Change: Ratification of the United Nations Framework Convention and the Kyoto Protocol
Journal of Conflict Resolution, April 1, 2008; 52(2): 243 - 268.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
H. V. Milner
Commentary on the Special Issue
Journal of Conflict Resolution, April 1, 2008; 52(2): 334 - 337.
[PDF]