This Article Full Text (PDF) Datasets References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Ward, H. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

International Linkages and Environmental Sustainability: The Effectiveness of the Regime Network

Department of Government, University of Essex

While the literature on environmental regime effectiveness has focused on particular regimes considered in isolation, the overall effects of the system of regimes are more relevant. First, regimes are connected because they often share institutional architecture, deal with different aspects of the same problem, frame issues using similar legal and policy principles, and are subject to attempts to coordinate across issues by groups of nations, NGOs and international agencies. Thus, the network of regimes has social capital that can be applied to particular issues. Second, owing to ecological interconnectedness, regimes can have both positive and negative side-effects on environmental issues that they do not explicitly deal with. Allowing for political interconnectedness using concepts drawn from social network theory and for ecological interconnectedness using broad measures of sustainability, this article argues that nations more central to the network of environmental regimes should score higher on measures of sustainability. This is because the social capital in the regime network can more easily be brought to bear on centrally placed nations to make them cooperate and because they are more likely to be aware of negative regime side-effects. Measures of network centrality do, indeed, positively impact on nations’ performance on four sustainability indicators. The analysis also finds that a nation's position in the general international system further positively impacts on its sustainability scores. This leads to the suggestion that the environmental regime network is supported by social capital in more general international networks.

Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 43, No. 2, 149-166 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0022343306061545


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. B. Whitford and J. A. Tucker Technology and the Evolution of the Regulatory State Comparative Political Studies, December 1, 2009; 42(12): 1567 - 1590. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. M. Hafner-Burton, J. von Stein, and E. Gartzke International Organizations Count Journal of Conflict Resolution, April 1, 2008; 52(2): 175 - 188. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Dorussen and H. Ward Intergovernmental Organizations and the Kantian Peace: A Network Perspective Journal of Conflict Resolution, April 1, 2008; 52(2): 189 - 212. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. von Stein The International Law and Politics of Climate Change: Ratification of the United Nations Framework Convention and the Kyoto Protocol Journal of Conflict Resolution, April 1, 2008; 52(2): 243 - 268. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. V. Milner Commentary on the Special Issue Journal of Conflict Resolution, April 1, 2008; 52(2): 334 - 337. [PDF]