Journal of Peace Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Datasets
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gleditsch, K. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 44, No. 3, 293-309 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0022343307076637

Transnational Dimensions of Civil War

Kristian Skrede Gleditsch

Department of Government, University of Essex & Centre for the Study of Civil War, PRIO, ksg{at}essex.ac.uk

Existing research has related civil war primarily to country-specific factors or processes that take place within individual states experiencing conflict. Many contemporary civil wars, however, display a transnational character, where actors, resources, and events span national boundaries. This article challenges the 'closed polity' approach to the study of civil war, where individual states are treated as independent entities, and posits that transnational factors and linkages between states can exert strong influences on the risk of violent civil conflict. Previous research has shown that conflicts in a state's regional context can increase the risk of conflict, but the research has not distinguished between different varieties of transnational linkages that may underlie geographic contagion, and it has failed to consider the potential influences of domestic attributes. The article develops and evaluates a series of hypotheses on how transnational factors can influence the risk of conflict and the prospects for maintaining peace in a conditional autologistic model, including country-specific factors often associated with civil wars. The results suggest that transnational linkages between states and regional factors strongly influence the risk of civil conflict. This, in turn, implies that the risk of civil war is not determined just by a country's internal or domestic characteristics, but differs fundamentally, depending on a country's linkages to other states.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
K. S. Gleditsch, I. Salehyan, and K. Schultz
Fighting at Home, Fighting Abroad: How Civil Wars Lead to International Disputes
Journal of Conflict Resolution, August 1, 2008; 52(4): 479 - 506.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
Z. Iqbal and C. Zorn
The Political Consequences of Assassination
Journal of Conflict Resolution, June 1, 2008; 52(3): 385 - 400.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
E. Forsberg
Polarization and Ethnic Conflict in a Widened Strategic Setting
Journal of Peace Research, March 1, 2008; 45(2): 283 - 300.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
L. Harbom and P. Wallensteen
Armed Conflict, 1989 2006
Journal of Peace Research, September 1, 2007; 44(5): 623 - 634.
[Abstract] [PDF]