Journal of Peace Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Østby, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 45, No. 2, 143-162 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0022343307087169
© 2008 International Peace Research Institute, Oslo

Polarization, Horizontal Inequalities and Violent Civil Conflict

Gudrun Østby

Department of Political Science, University of Oslo and Centre for the Study of Civil War (CSCW), International Peace Research Institute, Oslo (PRIO), gudrun.ostby{at}stv.uio.no

Recent large-N studies of civil war conclude that inequality does not increase the risk of violent conflict. This article argues that such conclusions may be premature because these studies, which usually test the conflict potential of `vertical inequality' (i.e. income inequality between individuals), tend to neglect the group aspect of inequality. Case studies suggest that what matters for conflict is a concept closely linked to both economic and ethnic polarization: `horizontal inequalities', or inequalities that coincide with identity-based cleavages. Horizontal inequalities may enhance both grievances and group cohesion among the relatively deprived and thus facilitate mobilization for conflict. This article provides a quantitative test of this argument, exploring whether various forms of polarization and horizontal inequalities affect the probability of civil conflict onset across 36 developing countries in the period 1986—2004. National household data from the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) are used to construct measures of ethnic, social and economic polarization, as well as vertical and horizontal inequalities along two dimensions: social and economic. The article also introduces a combined measure of ethnic/socio-economic polarization as an alternative to the horizontal inequality measure. Robust results from panel and cross-section analyses show that social polarization and horizontal social inequality are positively related to conflict outbreak. Variables for purely ethnic polarization, inter-individual inequalities and combined ethnic/socio-economic polarization are not significant.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
J. Esteban and G. Schneider
Polarization and Conflict: Theoretical and Empirical Issues
Journal of Peace Research, March 1, 2008; 45(2): 131 - 141.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
J. Esteban and D. Ray
Polarization, Fractionalization and Conflict
Journal of Peace Research, March 1, 2008; 45(2): 163 - 182.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
H. Hegre
Polarization and Interstate Conflict
Journal of Peace Research, March 1, 2008; 45(2): 261 - 282.
[Abstract] [PDF]