Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Peace Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Esteban, J.
Right arrow Articles by Ray, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Polarization, Fractionalization and Conflict

Joan Esteban

Institut d'Anàlisi Económica, CSIC, Barcelona, joan.esteban{at}iae.csic.es

Debraj Ray

Department of Economics, New York University & Institut d'Anàlisi Económica, CSIC, Barcelona, debraj.ray{at}nyu.edu

This article provides a theoretical framework that distinguishes between the occurrence of conflict and its severity, and clarifies the role of polarization and fractionalization in each of these cases. The analysis helps in ordering the various definitions, and in providing explanations for the empirical observations on the relationship between conflict, on the one hand, and polarization or fractionalization, on the other. The behaviour of players in conflict is described as a game, and equilibrium payoffs to all players are computed. The status quo is characterized by a set of political institutions that channel the different opposing interests and turn them into a collective decision, with a second set of payoffs. Groups rebel against the status quo political institution whenever the latter set of payoffs is dominated by the former. When society is highly polarized, the potential cost of rebellion is extremely high, and this cost may serve as the guarantor of peace. So, in highly polarized societies, the occurrence of open conflict should be rare but its intensity very severe, whenever it happens. On the other hand, highly fractionalized societies are prone to the occurrence of conflict, but its intensity will be moderate. It matters, therefore, whether one studies the intensity of conflict, conditional on conflict breaking out, or the likelihood that conflict actually occurs. Specifically, it is shown that: (i) measures of fractionalization and polarization tend to run in opposite directions, (ii) the onset of conflict critically depends on the political system in place, (iii) the occurrence of conflict and the intensity of conflict also tend to move in opposite directions, (iv) the relationship between polarization or fractionalization and conflict is non-monotonic and (v) the intensity of conflict depends positively on the degree of polarization.

Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 45, No. 2, 163-182 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0022343307087175


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Conflict Management and Peace ScienceHome page
H. Fjelde and I. De Soysa
Coercion, Co-optation, or Cooperation?: State Capacity and the Risk of Civil War, 1961--2004
Conflict Management and Peace Science, February 1, 2009; 26(1): 5 - 25.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Conflict ResolutionHome page
R. Bhavnani and D. Miodownik
Ethnic Polarization, Ethnic Salience, and Civil War
Journal of Conflict Resolution, February 1, 2009; 53(1): 30 - 49.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
J. Esteban and G. Schneider
Polarization and Conflict: Theoretical and Empirical Issues
Journal of Peace Research, March 1, 2008; 45(2): 131 - 141.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
G. Ostby
Polarization, Horizontal Inequalities and Violent Civil Conflict
Journal of Peace Research, March 1, 2008; 45(2): 143 - 162.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
G. Schneider and N. Wiesehomeier
Rules That Matter: Political Institutions and the Diversity--Conflict Nexus
Journal of Peace Research, March 1, 2008; 45(2): 183 - 203.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
E. Forsberg
Polarization and Ethnic Conflict in a Widened Strategic Setting
Journal of Peace Research, March 1, 2008; 45(2): 283 - 300.
[Abstract] [PDF]