Journal of Peace Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schneider, G.
Right arrow Articles by Wiesehomeier, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 45, No. 2, 183-203 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0022343307087176
© 2008 International Peace Research Institute, Oslo

Rules That Matter: Political Institutions and the Diversity—Conflict Nexus

Gerald Schneider

Department of Politics and Management, University of Konstanz, Gerald.Schneider{at}uni-konstanz.de

Nina Wiesehomeier

Department of Politics and Management, University of Konstanz, Nina.Wiesehomeier{at}uni-konstanz.de

One controversy in the study of civil war relates to the role that institutions play in ethnically diverse societies. `Constitutional engineers' advance various institutional arrangements, ranging from democracy in general to specific constitutional and electoral rules, as those mechanisms that help divided societies to resolve disputes peacefully. Political sociologists, by contrast, maintain that political institutions are largely an epiphenomenon. Synthesizing the two conflicting schools of thought, the authors examine how different institutions in conjunction with three forms of ethnic diversity — fractionalization, dominance and polarization — affect the risk of civil war. It is argued that groups perceive institutions as a constraint and that they consider the usage of political violence if they cannot achieve their goals peacefully. The examination of these conditional institutionalist hypotheses for the period between 1950 and 2000 shows, in accordance with recent theoretical work, that fractionalization can indeed be linked to low-intensity civil wars and that this effect is particularly strong in democracies in comparison to autocracies. Interacting the measures of diversity with different democratic institutions, the authors confirm that rules that encourage power-sharing lower the risk of war in diverse societies. The event-history models, moreover, show that the combination of fractionalization and majoritarian voting forebodes badly for the internal stability of a state. Within the set of democratic regimes studied in this article, presidential systems are the most war-prone institutional setting.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
J. Esteban and G. Schneider
Polarization and Conflict: Theoretical and Empirical Issues
Journal of Peace Research, March 1, 2008; 45(2): 131 - 141.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
J. Esteban and D. Ray
Polarization, Fractionalization and Conflict
Journal of Peace Research, March 1, 2008; 45(2): 163 - 182.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
I. H. Indridason
Does Terrorism Influence Domestic Politics? Coalition Formation and Terrorist Incidents
Journal of Peace Research, March 1, 2008; 45(2): 241 - 259.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
E. Forsberg
Polarization and Ethnic Conflict in a Widened Strategic Setting
Journal of Peace Research, March 1, 2008; 45(2): 283 - 300.
[Abstract] [PDF]