Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Peace Research
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Butler, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, N. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Security Forces and Sexual Violence: A Cross-National Analysis of a Principal—Agent Argument

Christopher K. Butler

Department of Political Science, University of New Mexico

Tali Gluch

Department of Political Science, University of New Mexico

Neil J. Mitchell

Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Aberdeen, n.mitchell{at}abdn.ac.uk

This article investigates sexual violence committed by government security forces. It focuses on the issue of delegation. It uses principal—agent logic to understand sexual violence committed by these forces and to set up a cross-national empirical analysis. The article provides an approach to measuring the amount of agent discretion in a political system and an analysis of new cross-national data on the incidence of rape and sexual violence committed by police and security forces. It is argued that sexual violence is a category of human rights violation that is more likely to be attributable to the selfish motivations of agents, and it is an act that is likely to be hidden. This article identifies the conditions under which these acts are most likely to occur as conditions of conflict, system-wide slack bureaucratic control, and where there are constraints on information and organization. The theoretical argument makes sense of earlier findings in the human rights literature, such as the importance of democracy and conflict, while directing attention to motivations, accountability, and, for the first time in systematic analyses of human rights, to the particular issue of sexual violence. The use of cross-national data on the incidence of sexual violence for the year 2003 provides preliminary support for the theoretical argument. After controlling for factors likely to increase the incidence of sexual violence, such as military size and ethnic fractionalization, it is found that, where agents are more accountable and subject to tighter control, sexual violence is less likely. Finally, the article points to the importance of additional data collection over time, consistent with other human rights and conflict datasets, and draws out some policy implications following from the theoretical argument and analysis.

References

  • Acemoglu, Daron & Thierry Verdier, 2000. `The Choice Between Market Failures and Corruption', American Economic Review 90 (March): 194—211.[Web of Science]
  • Amnesty International, 2004. ` It's in Our Hands: Stop the Violence Against Women' ( http://web.amnesty.org/actforwomen/reports-index-eng).
  • Amnesty International, 2006. ` Russian Federation: Russian Chechen Friendship Society Closed Under New NGO Law' (http://news.amnesty.org/index/ENGEUR460482006, last accessed 23 November 2006).
  • Apodaca, Clair, 2000. `The Effects of Foreign Aid on Women's Economic and Social Human Rights', Journal of Third World Studies 17(2): 205—219.
  • Arat, Zehra, 2002. `The Women's Convention and State Reservations: The Lack of Compliance by Muslim States', paper presented at the 43rd Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, New Orleans, LA, 24—27 March.
  • Arrow, Kenneth J., 1985. `The Economics of Agency', in John W. Pratt & Richard J. Zeckhauser, eds, Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press (37—51).
  • Askin, Kelly D., 1999. `Sexual Violence in Decisions and Indictments of the Yugoslav and Rwandan Tribunals: Current Status', American Journal of International Law 93 (January): 97—123.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Banks, Jeffrey S. & Barry R. Weingast, 1992. `The Political Control of Bureaucracies Under Asymmetric Information', American Journal of Political Science 36 (May): 509—524.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Bardhan, Pranab, 1997. `Corruption and Development: A Review of Issues', Journal of Economic Literature 35(3): 1320—1346.[Web of Science]
  • Bawn, Kathleen, 1995. `Political Control Versus Expertise: Congressional Choices About Administrative Procedures', American Political Science Review 89 (March): 62—73.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Beer, Caroline & Neil J. Mitchell, 2004. `Democracy and Human Rights in the Mexican States: Elections or Social Capital', International Studies Quarterly 48(2): 293—312.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Beevor, Anthony, 2002. Berlin: The Downfall 1945. London: Viking.
  • Brehm, John & Scott Gates, 1997. Working, Shirking, and Sabotage: Bureaucratic Response to a Democratic Public. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  • Browning, Christopher R., 1998. Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland. New York: HarperCollins.
  • Brownmiller, Susan, 1975. Against Our Will: Men, Women and Rape. London: Secker and Warburg.
  • Brysk, Alison, 1994. The Politics of Human Rights in Argentina: Protest, Change, and Democratization. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, United States Department of State, 2004. Country Reports on Human Rights Practices (http://www.state.gov/g/drl/hr/c1470.htm, last accessed 25 July 2006).
  • Burkhart, Ross E., 2002. `The Capitalist Political Economy and Human Rights: Cross-National Evidence', Social Science Journal 39(2): 155—170.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Chang, Iris, 1997. The Rape of Nanking. London: Penguin.
  • Childress, Sarah & Michael Hirsh, 2006. `An Itchy Finger', Newsweek, 7 August. (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14097559/site/newsweek/, accessed 19 November 2006.)
  • Cingranelli, David L. & David L. Richards, 1999. `Respect for Human Rights After the End of the Cold War', Journal of Peace Research 36(5): 511—534.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Davenport, Christian & David A. Armstrong II, 2004. `Democracy and the Violation of Human Rights: A Statistical Analysis from 1976 to 1996', American Journal of Political Science 48 (July): 538—554.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Enloe, Cynthia H., 1983. Does Khaki Become You? The Militarisation of Women's Lives. Boston, MA: South End.
  • Enloe, Cynthia H., 2000. Maneuvers: The International Politics of Militarizing Women's Lives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Fearon, James D., 2003. `Ethnic and Cultural Diversity by Country', Journal of Economic Growth 8(2): 195—222.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Gartner, Scott Sigmund & Patrick M. Regan, 1996. `Threat and Repression: The NonLinear Relationship Between Government and Opposition Violence', Journal of Peace Research 33(3): 273—287.[Abstract]
  • Gibney, Mark & Matthew Dalton, 1996. `The Political Terror Scale ', Policy Studies and Developing Nations 4(1): 73—84.
  • Gleditsch, Nils Petter; Peter, Wallensteen, Mikael, Eriksson, Margareta Sollenberg& HåvardStrand, 2002. `Armed Conflict 1946—2001: A New Dataset', Journal of Peace Research 39(5): 615—637.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Goldstein, Joshua S., 2001. War and Gender: How Gender Shapes the War System and Vice Versa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Harrelson-Stephens, Julie & Rhonda Callaway, 2003. `Does Trade Openness Promote Security Rights in Developing Countries? Examining the Liberal Perspective ', International Interactions 29 (April—June): 143—158.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Hathaway, Oona, 2002. `Do Human Rights Treaties Make A Difference?', Yale Law Journal 111 (June): 1935—2042.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Henderson, Conway W., 1991. `Conditions Affecting the Use of Political Repression ', Journal of Conflict Resolution 35 (March): 120—142.[Abstract]
  • Henderson, Conway W., 2004. `The Political Repression of Women', Human Rights Quarterly 26(4): 1028—1049.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Huber, John D. & Nolan McCarty, 2004. `Bureaucratic Capacity, Delegation, and Political Reform', American Political Science Review 98(3): 481—494.[Web of Science]
  • Kalyvas, Stathis, 2006. The Logic of Violence in Civil War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kaufmann, Daniel; Aart Kraay & Massimo Mastruzzi, 2005. `Governance Matters IV: Governance Indicators for 1996—2004 ', World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series No. 3630, May (http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance/govdata/, last accessed 25 July 2006).
  • Keck, Margaret & Kathryn Sikkink, 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Keith, Linda Camp, 1999. `The United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Does It Make a Difference in Human Rights Behavior', Journal of Peace Research 36(1): 95—118.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Keith, Linda Camp, 2002. `Constitutional Provisions for Individual Human Rights (1977—1996): Are They More Than Mere "Window Dressing"? ', Political Research Quarterly 55(1): 111—143.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Lopez, George A. & Michael Stohl, 1992. `Problems of Concept and Measurement in the Study of Human Rights', in T. B. Jabine & R. P. Claude, eds, Human Rights and Statistics: Getting the Record Straight. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania (216—234).
  • Lynch, Colum, 2004. `U.N. Sexual Abuse Alleged in Congo: Peacekeepers Accused in Draft Report', Washington Post, 16 December: A26.
  • McCormick, James M. & Neil J. Mitchell, 1997. `Human Rights Violations, Umbrella Concepts, and Empirical Analysis', World Politics 49 (July): 510—525.[Web of Science]
  • Marshall, Monty G. & Keith Jaggers, 2002. Polity IV Dataset. [Computer file; version p4v2002] College Park, MD: Center for International Development and Conflict Management, University of Maryland.
  • Meier, Kenneth J., 1993. Politics and the Bureaucracy: Policymaking in the Fourth Branch of Government. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks-Cole.
  • Mitchell, Neil, 2004. Agents of Atrocity: Leaders, Followers, and the Violation of Human Rights in Civil Wars. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Montinola, Gabriella R. & Robert W. Jackman, 2002. `Sources of Corruption: A Cross-National Study', British Journal of Political Science 32 (January): 147—170.[Web of Science]
  • Moore, Will H., 2000. `The Repression of Dissent: A Substitution Model of Government Coercion', Journal of Conflict Resolution 44(1): 107—127.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Morris, Benny, 1999. Righteous Victims: A History of the Zionist—Arab Conflict, 1881—1999. New York: Knopf.
  • Niarchos, Catherine N., 1995. `Women, War, and Rape: Challenges Facing The International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia', Human Rights Quarterly 17(4): 649—690.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Poe, Steven & Neil Tate, 1994. `Repression of Human Rights to Personal Integrity in the 1980s: A Global Analysis', American Political Science Review 88(4): 853—872.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Poe, Steven; Sabine Carey & Tanya C. Vazquez, 2001. `How Are These Pictures Different? A Quantitative Comparison of the US State Department and Amnesty International Human Rights Reports, 1976—1995 ', Human Rights Quarterly 23(3): 650—677.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Poe, Steven; Neil Tate& Linda Camp Keith, 1999. `Repression of the Human Right to Personal Integrity Revisited: A Global Cross-National Study Covering the Years 1976—1993', International Studies Quarterly 43(2): 291—313.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Richards, David; Ronald D. Gelleny& David H. Sacko, 2001. `Money with a Mean Streak? Foreign Economic Penetration and Government Respect for Human Rights in Developing Countries', International Studies Quarterly 45 (June): 219—239.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Rothman, David J. & Aryeh Neier, 1991. `India's Awful Prisons', New York Review of Books, 16 May.
  • Semple, Kirk, 2006. `Iraq Hearing on Rape and Murder Opens', New York Times, 7 August: 9.
  • Shanker, Thom, 2004. `Inquiry Faults Commanders in Assaults on Cadets', New York Times, 8 December: 18.
  • Silone, Ignazio, 1961. `Reflections on the Welfare State', Dissent 8: 189.
  • Singer, J. David; Stuart Bremer & John Stuckey, 1972. `Capability Distribution, Uncertainty, and Major Power War, 1820—1965', in Bruce Russett, ed., Peace, War and Numbers. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage (19—48).
  • Walzer, Michael, 1977. Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. New York: Basic.
  • Waterman, Richard W.; Amelia A. Rouse & Robert L. Wright, 2004. Bureaucrats, Politics and the Environment. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Weldon, S. Laurel, 2002. Protest, Policy, and the Problem of Violence Against Women: A Cross-National Comparison. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Wood, Elisabeth J., 2004. `Sexual Violence During War: Explaining Variation', paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, 2—5 September.
  • Wood, Elisabeth J., 2006. `Vanation in Sexual Violence During War', Politics and Society 34(3): 307—342.[CrossRef]
  • World Bank, 2004. World Development Indicators (http://devdata.worldbank.org/data-query/, last accessed 25 July 2006).
  • United Nations, 2006a. `In-Depth Study of All Forms of Violence Against Women', Report of the Secretary General. United Nations General Assembly A/61/122/Add.1 (6 July).
  • United Nations, 2006b. `Problem of Sexual Abuse by Peacekeepers', United Nations Security Council SC/8649.
  • Zakaria, Fareed, 2003. The Future of Freedom: Illiberal Democracy at Home and Abroad. New York: Norton.

Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 44, No. 6, 669-687 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0022343307082058
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Butler, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, N. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?